Thanks for the reply Bec, I do appreciate you taking the time to address the points I’ve raised.
Now, to start with, I'm going to have to say this (though I'm aware it comes with the risk of offending you more): I'm sure that "When I have, or when I have shared my opinion about something, I have been jumped on, patronised and spoken down to by the moderators." is a bit of a hyperbole. Sure, I've been missing in action for long enough because of my commitments of my education that have meant I've missed a lot of your earlier experiences on the forum, which means I can't be 100% sure, but I can't fathom why the mods would attack everything you say. In the instances where we would have intervened, it's probably because something was done to upset rules, we've received e-mails and/or PMs from other members of the forum expressing that they found what was said offensive, or some other valid reason. We wouldn't just jump in somewhere for no reason. Despite what is believed about all of the mods and admin, we don't like fighting and we certainly don't like the conflict here on F&I.
The reason I have been jumped on, as explained in the PM I received from one of the moderators, is because they did not feel I was integrating myself in the forum, and I continued to post information about the Hub Productions. I would have thought being a fan they would like to know what a convention organiser had planned, but obviously I was mistaken. As far as “not integrating” I explained that a large number of the girls here are quite young and the topics of discussion to not appeal to me. I would like to stress that is not a criticism of the girl here. Everyone has different interests and different ways of thinking at different ages, so it just means I am at a different point to them. That is a big part of why I am more of a lurker than a poster here. I would be curious to know though if I have actually breached any rules in any of my posts as I have never been advised of doing so.
In regards to your commentary about fangirls and fangirl behaviour, as we already said over in the previous conventions thread, there were a fair few of us who felt that the comments both you and MarraJane made were derogatory to "teenies", many of whom frequent our forum. It is why we asked you both to curb your language and why we fought to defend our younger members because it was seen that, essentially, it was breaking (or in danger of violating) the forum's fifth and most important rule: Be nice.
I still do not understand how my post could have been misconstrued.
I'm sure most people are sensible enough to know where to draw the line with what touching is and isn't ok, but it doesn't hurt to just clarify that there is a line that can't be crossed. Apparently at one con, some girl decided it was totally ok to put her hand down the back of the guests pants
Thankfully people like that are few and far between, but they do show up at cons on occasion.
Again, I have bolded where I specifically pointed out that it is not the majority of fans. I specifically said most people are sensible, and those that aren't are few and far between. So could you please enlighten me as to when I was 'derogatory'?
As for the Hoyts distribution messages about there not being a premiere, our point was simply to let there be hope. Not to mention, we have a tendency to deal with "insider information" about premieres, cast attendance etc with more skepticism now after being entirely too trusting in our earlier months of the forum with someone who claimed to have "information through Greater Union". If we asked you not to shoot down hope for a premiere, it was, in essence, that cynicism talking, and was never a direct attack at you, rather we felt it more prudent to wait for information which wasn't coming through a third party. Chinese whispers of information can lead to it being distorted and changed, and often lead to more detrimental consequences than positive. The mod that asked you to stop most likely had this in mind and was hoping to spare unnecessary disappointment or elation until we got 100% confirmation.
Everyone here was under the impression that there would definitely be a premiere. Girls were planning to go to something that was not happening. I was merely advising them of that. I never said there would not be a premiere at any point, just that at that point in time there was not one, which is the information I had been given from Hoyts Distribution who has the distributing rights to Twilight within Australia. All I did was make a phone call as a member of the general public, which anyone here was free to make, so it was never ‘insider information’. That said, I do understand scepticism of ‘insider information’. The difference however between myself and the other forum member who made claims, their claims was that things would be happening and that they could obtain certain things for people and by doing so got peoples hopes up, while I was advising that something would not be happening so people wouldn’t get their hopes up. I thought I was doing the right thing there, others don’t. We will just have to agree to disagree on the matter.
Fallen_Angel wrote:Now if I was interested in just causing trouble, I could quite easily do that. I have quite a bit of information about the moderators and other key members of F&I which would not show them in a favourable light were this information to come out. I have kept this information to myself out of respect for the people involved, and I will not publicly disclose this information at any time out of continued respect for them and the fandom.
Dana, I think you need to be aware of the serious nature of what you've just said. Whether or not you intended it to be read this way or not, that entire paragraph reads like blackmail -- that if we don't bend to your wishes, you'll spread information about our members. This is a serious threat, Dana, and one we will not take lightly. Even if you didn't intend it to, this goes back to exactly what I asked of everyone on the conventions thread before -- please, please watch your diction. This is the internet. All we see is words on a page. It's up to the reader to add emphasis and tone, and unless you make it blatantly obvious, there will be misinterpretation along the line and it can just add fuel to an already raging fire.
According to
http://www.askoxford.com, Blackmail is defined as follows:
• noun 1 the demanding of money from someone in return for not revealing discreditable information.
2 the use of threats or manipulation in an attempt to influence someone’s actions. As you can see be the definition, I did not blackmail anyone. I did not ask for money, or anything else for that matter, with the threat of making information public. In fact, I made a point of not only saying I haven’t made the information public, but also that I would
never make the information public. As far as wanting the moderators her to bend to my wishes, what wishes are they exactly? I don’t recall actually asking for anything. If you choose to interpret my post in that way, then that is your prerogative. I was merely backing up my statement that I was not trying to cause trouble, because if I wanted to cause trouble, I could. I do agree blackmail is a serious matter and it is illegal, so if you have any concerns about being ‘blackmailed’, then by all means, take the matter further. In fact, I would encourage you to seek legal advice on the matter if you feel that I am indeed blackmailing anyone. Also, you should be aware of the claims you make against people, as slander is also a very serious matter.
Aren't you all sick of the fighting and bickering? It's getting to a point where I'm worried about coming on here for fear of a new attack that really is making me feel victimised [and I'm sure some of the other mods feel the same way]. We're not perfect, we know. The mods and admin are only human, after all, and we never claimed to be anything but (except for that brief period during the HSC where I claimed to be a pine cone, but that really has no impact on this argument). We've all broken our fair share of rules, particularly in the early days of the forum, where Mallie had to remind us all constantly not to picspam or post irrelevantly about RPatz or Twilight, but we're trying as best we can now to stick to them and keep the forum going as it was intended to: as a place where Australian fans can hang out and chat together, as well as with our fantastic members from overseas.
I joined here because I enjoy being part of a fandom. I am an active member of another online fan community, and I missed out on the ‘beginnings’ of that fandom, so being here and being able to post prior to the movie coming out was a pretty cool thing. I am sick of the fighting, which is why I have not posted a number of things that I would have liked to post. There have been some things that I’m sure mos people here would have liked to know, however when my posts are, more often than not, shot down by the moderators here it does not make me feel welcome and does not make me want to post information here.
And as horrible as it is to say this, if you can't abide by the rules we've set down to try to keep it safe, fun and happy here -- if you truly hate us that much, then no-one's forcing you to come on here and fight with us. It'll suck to lose people we've had fun chatting, laughing and joking with, but if you can't stand it because you truly think we're evil dictators and out to steal your basic human rights, then we won't stop you leaving us. We're not going to force you to stay here (as if we could), and we'll say goodbye with a heavy heart, but it's ultimately your choice to stay or go.
Again, could you please outline what rules I have broken as I have not been advised which rules are being broken. I have even asked a moderator to advise me how I could post differently to avoid any trouble. I was told to post 'nicer'. I asked how exactly can post 'nicer' and I am still waiting to be told. So I have made an effort to do the right thing but I can only do so much. I don’t recall ever saying I hated anyone here. Why would I? I have far more important things happening in my life, both good and bad, to hate some faceless names on the internet. When I was told in a PM by a moderator here that something about me gets under their skin and it's gotten to the point where she wants to strangle me. I will say again now exactly what I said to her then. I don't actually have an issue, personally, with her or any other mod here. This whole thing, water under the bridge to me. I was then, and still am, a little confused as to where all the hostility came from but I honestly don't hold any negative feelings. I am not one for holding grudges, particularly with people who for all intensive persons are an anonymous persona oline. I don’t recall ever saying anyone here was an evil dictator, and out to steal my basic human rights. I also stated in my previous post that I don’t want to leave, so it’s ok. Your hearts can be lightened

Oh, and Dana? It's on page 16 of the locked conventions thread. The implication was made by jamie_123 that we believed we were better than TA because we thought TA was full of "bad behaviour". Which wasn't meant to be implied in the slightest, but rather what was meant was the fact we're a smaller forum than TA's means that F&I is, theoretically, an easier forum to moderate than the much larger TA forums.
Great, thanks for that Bec. I wasn’t too sure where anything was said as I hadn’t actually had the chance to read that
